Johnson & Johnson Lawsuit Jury Awarded the Women $4.69 Billion in July, and that Decision was Upheld by a Judge on Wednesday.

Johnson & Johnson has been ordered to pay $4.7bn (£3.6bn) in damages to 22 women who alleged that its talc products caused them to develop ovarian cancer.
A jury in the US state of Missouri initially awarded $550m in compensation and added $4.1bn in punitive damages.
The verdict comes as the pharmaceutical giant battles some 9,000 legal cases involving its signature baby powder.
The judge wrote that “substantial evidence was adduced at trial of particularly reprehensible conduct” by Johnson & Johnson including that the company “knew of the presence of asbestos in products that they knowingly targeted for sale to mothers and babies, knew of the damage their products caused, and misrepresented the safety of these products for decades.”
J&J said it was "deeply disappointed" and plans to appeal. In the six-week trial, the women and their families said they developed ovarian cancer after using baby powder and other talc products for decades. Of the 22 women represented in this case, six have died from ovarian cancer. Their lawyers alleged the company knew its talc was contaminated with asbestos since the 1970s but failed to warn consumers about the risks.
'Unfair process'
Talc is a mineral and can sometimes be found in the ground in close proximity to asbestos. Johnson & Johnson denied that its products ever contained asbestos and insisted that they do not cause cancer. The pharmaceutical giant added that several studies have shown its talc to be safe and said the verdict was a product of a "fundamentally unfair process".
Record verdict

The verdict is the largest payout Johnson & Johnson has faced over the allegations.
Punitive damages are often reduced by the trial judge or on appeal, and J&J has succeeded in having several jury verdicts overturned, some of them on technical grounds.
A previous ruling in 2017 by a California jury awarded $417m (£323.4m) to a woman who said she developed ovarian cancer after using the firm's products, including baby powder. However, a judge later overturned that verdict and several other legal challenges by J&J are yet to be decided.
The majority of the 22 women were from outside the state of Missouri. The presentation of their combined cases at such a court is known as forum shopping. This will be one of the elements challenged by Johnson & Johnson at appeal.
Johnson & Johnson said: "Every verdict against Johnson & Johnson in this court that has gone through the appeals process has been reversed and the multiple errors present in this trial were worse than those in the prior trials which have been reversed."
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/19/business/johnson-johnson-baby-powder-verdict.html